http://www.apaw71.dsl.pipex.com/decisions/ Paranormal Phenomena: May 2006

Friday, May 19, 2006

Are 'orbs' hiding a real phenomenon?

There is little doubt that the vast majority of 'orbs' are photographic artefacts caused by the move to digital cameras (requiring lenses with a vastly increased depth of field). The orbs are out of focus bits of dust that were invisible in film cameras.

Before the advent of orbs there were always reports of light anomalies, both in interior hauntings and in various locations outdoors - sometimes associated with UFOs. The major difference between these lights and orbs is that these lights were SEEN by witnesses. It was extremely rare to get a photograph of one but it did happen sometimes. Whether some, or all, of these lights have a mundane explanation, is yet to be determined. The big point is, with so many people getting excited about spurious 'orbs', these light phenomena are being overlooked or even dismissed as mere 'orbs'.

It would be fascinating to know what these light phenomena really are. Some might be fireflies or even reflections but it is unlikely this accounts for all of them. The trouble is, we may never know.

Wednesday, May 17, 2006

Scientific study of the paranormal

While science is a strict discipline involving logic, debate, evidence and theories, it is practised by scientists who are people. They can sometimes have inspirations and beliefs that go far beyond the available evidence. They just 'know' the answer, even though they can't prove it. For instance, it was long been 'obvious', from maps of the world, that Africa 'fitted' South America and were once connected. And yet, when the idea of continental drift was first put forward there was no scientific evidence and it was dismissed by critics. Still, some people just KNEW it was right - almost a form of faith!

It is not mentioned much but science often involves such a leap of faith. A scientist will know instinctively that their idea is right even though they don't have the solid evidence to demonstrate it. Often it means waiting until suitable technology is developed to test the idea.

So what's the difference between a scientist's hunch and someone believing that minds can communicate with ESP, for instance? It is that the scientist must build up a body of good evidence to test their theory. They will also face criticism from fellow scientists. This is not aimed at them personally but at their ideas. If an idea is to be accepted, it must be tested by logic as well as evidence. Further experiments then take place taking the criticism into account. Also, the experiments should be replicated by other scientists. This is in case there is some unknown systematic error in the original experiments. If the theory survives this process then it will be accepted as new science, despite the fact that it started out as no more than a hunch.
So there is no scientific problem with someone believing that minds can communicate with ESP provided they can demonstrate it and are happy to have their work examined, criticised and replicated by others. This is the scientific process.

Many scientific theories have started as unprovable thoughts in direct contradiction to the science of the day. The paranormal always stands in that position. If you have a weird idea, don't be afraid to share it but be prepared to test it.

Web Site Counter